Self hosting vs IIS hosting
We are about to upgrade from v6 to v8. We currently have IIS hosting implemented with 6 but was curious if there is a benefit of using one over the other. Or if one is recommended over the other.
Comments
-
Typically we recommend Self-Hosting for all environments purely because it removes the additional layer of complexity that IIS adds to the Decisions instance, and is much easier to maintain in the long run.
However, from a user/performance standpoint, there is no difference. If IIS is something that you're comfortable using (or in the event it's necessary, such as needing a Virtual Directory), we're more than happy to support the configuration you choose.
Additional documentation on Self-Hosting/IIS Hosting: https://documentation.decisions.com/docs/installer-hosting-options
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 4.4K All Categories
- 78 General
- 13 Training
- 209 Installation / Setup
- 1.1K Flows
- 110 Rules
- 270 Administration
- 213 Portal
- 497 General Q & A
- 709 Forms
- 345 Reports
- 3 Designer Extensions
- 48 Example Flows
- 58 CSS Examples
- 1 Diagram Tile
- 7 Javascript Controls
- 186 Pages
- 5 Process Mining
- New Features
- 186 Datastructures
- 70 Repository
- 229 Integrations
- 29 Multi-Tenant
- 27 SDK
- 81 Modules
- 59 Settings
- 25 Active Directory
- 12 Version 7
- 35 Version 8
- 143 Lunch And Learn Questions